![]() They are least skilled in developing assessment methods, communicating assessment results and using assessment in grading. Pre-service teachers were most proficient in the administration, scoring and interpretation of assessment results. ![]() On Assessment Literacy, pre-service teachers displayed relatively low assessment literacy, lower than the benchmarked in-service teachers as reported in the literature. Significant difference was found in their learning approaches across the individual characteristics of gender, in two of the five approaches, and educational qualification. They responded unfavourably that they i) approach learning new knowledge in the fastest possible manner, usually associated with a disinterest in the subject ii) extrinsic motivation, superficial learning, lack ownership towards learning, or iii) memorisation of knowledge, drill and practice. They were neutral in responding to the preparedness, learning ahead with inquisition approach. Pre-service teachers responded favourably that their approach to learning is characterised by: i) the deep personal satisfaction to want to learn, highly interested, self-directed. On Learning Approaches, the structure of pre-service teachers’ learning approaches were found to be non-hierarchical and consisted of five first-order factors. Significant difference was found in their conceptions of assessment across the individual characteristics of gender, in two of the conceptions, and across alternative work experiences, in one of the conceptions. They responded unfavourably that i) assessment interferes with teaching and forces teachers to teach against their beliefs, and ii) assessment is ignored, where assessment data and results are filed and not use. They were neutral in responding to the conception that assessment is valid and reliable measure of student performance. The subjects responded favourably that: i) assessment is used to evaluate the worth of a school, ii) assessment is used to hold students accountable for their learning, iii) assessment is used to diagnose student learning, to improve students’ learning and quality of teaching, iv) assessment is error-prone and results should be treated cautiously. Using structural equation modeling, the structure of pre-service teachers’ COA were found to be non-hierarchical and consisted of seven first-order factors. A mean score above 3.5 (i.e., midpoint of a six-point Likert scale) indicates favourable on the COA and SAL Scales and a mean score below 3.5 indicates unfavourable. Three instruments, the Teachers’ Conceptions of Assessment Inventory – Abridged Version (COA-IIIA), the revised two-factor Study Process Questionnaire (R-SPQ-2F), and the Teacher Assessment Literacy Questionnaire (TALQ) were adapted for this study. The participants were 477 pre-service teachers in Singapore. A secondary purpose of this study is to examine the possible influence of pre-service teachers’ conceptions of assessment and learning approaches on their assessment literacy. In addition, the possible influence of their individual characteristics – including gender, educational qualification, alternative work experiences and previous training in assessment – on the three constructs were investigated. The primary purpose of this study is to examine pre-service teachers’ baseline conceptions of assessment, learning approaches and assessment literacy. This article also reflects on the nature of CT as a construct. Thus, this study provides a tool to evaluate adults’ CT: the Algorithmic Thinking Test for Adults (ATTA), which was developed according to psychometric standards. Further analyzing the psychometric quality of the 27 items, 20 of them with excellent reliability indices were selected for the test. After a series of confirmatory factor analyses, a unidimensional model that represents algorithmic thinking was adopted. Next, the items were piloted on a sample of 289 participants, 137 experts in CT, and 152 novices. Then, in order to provide validity evidence based on the test content, a team of 11 subject-matter experts coded the initial pool of items using two different systems of categories based on CT components and contents. The team designed a set of items and explored a subset of those through two qualitative pilots. This study describes the development and validation process of a computational thinking (CT) test for adults.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |